Most acquisition entrepreneurs walk into seller financing conversations with the wrong message...

They lead with math-heavy deal mechanics (amortization schedules, interest terms, balance sheet treatment) and wonder why sellers either ghost them or counter with cash-only demands.

In a recent whiteboard session, Carl Allen of Dealmaker Wealth Society broke down a simple but powerful repositioning move he calls the "annuity deal."

His core argument: seller financing and an “annuity deal” are transactionally identical - the contracts, the payments, the legal structure are all the same… What changes is how the deal is framed to the seller.

That framing, Allen argues, could be the difference between a 4-month SBA grind and a 4-day close.

For acquisition entrepreneurs trying to win deals without writing massive checks, this is one of the highest-leverage shifts they can make:

To illustrate the structure, Allen walks through a hypothetical deal that mirrors the kinds of transactions his community closes regularly.

Imagine a business throwing off $400,000 per year in EBITDA. A traditional broker-led sale might value that business at a 2x to 2.5x multiple - roughly $800,000 to $1 million.

After tax, broker fees, and closing costs, the seller might net as little as $350,000 to invest for retirement.

Now compare that to an annuity deal at a 4x multiple - $1.6 million paid out over 10 years, monthly. That works out to $160,000 per year to the seller. The buyer keeps the remaining $240,000 of annual cash flow, or roughly $20,000 a month, while the seller collects as much as double the headline purchase price compared to a conventional cash exit.

Allen's analogy is straightforward: it's the same dynamic as financing a Tesla or mortgaging a house. If you pay cash, you pay the sticker price. When you stretch the payments, the total goes up, but the monthly experience becomes manageable, and in this case, far more attractive to the seller.

Allen frames every annuity deal conversation around 5 specific seller benefits. Acquisition entrepreneurs can lift this framework directly into their next seller call:

1. The seller gets significantly more money. Doubling the multiple from 2x to 4x - spread over a decade - means the seller walks away with substantially more total dollars than a cash-at-close offer would deliver.

2. The seller pays less tax. Allen references a change to the U.S. tax code (he cites Section 237) that allows sellers to be taxed only as they receive payments. Even better, those payments are typically treated as capital gains rather than ordinary income - a meaningful difference for retirees living off the proceeds. (Note: sellers should always confirm tax treatment with their own CPA before signing anything.)

3. The deal closes dramatically faster. An SBA 7(a) loan can take 4-5 months to fund, especially as the program continues working through processing backlogs. An annuity deal, by contrast, can close in 1-2 weeks, or even in just a few days. For sellers in distress or eager to retire, speed is often more valuable than the headline price.

4. The deal is far less stressful. SBA-backed deals come with heavy due diligence demands on the seller: tax returns, business plans, legal disclosures, lender questionnaires. An annuity deal requires only light-touch diligence - a few hours of attorney review and confirmation that taxes are filed and there's no pending litigation. For an exhausted owner, that reduction in friction is worth real money.

5. The seller gets income, not just a lump sum. This is the psychological masterstroke. Sellers approaching retirement don't actually want a pile of cash; they want monthly income to live on. The annuity deal delivers exactly that: a predictable monthly check that funds their lifestyle, while still being taxed lower as capital gains.

The label itself came from a real seller call Allen describes in detail.

A business owner was demanding a 6x multiple on a business that, by any standard industry benchmark, was worth closer to 3x.

Allen pressed him on where the number came from. The seller admitted his wealth manager - not a CPA or business broker - had reverse-engineered the valuation by calculating the size of an annuity product the seller would need to purchase to generate $12,000 per month in retirement income.

Allen's response was simple: Why buy an annuity from a money market product when the business itself can be the annuity?

He offered to pay the seller $12,000 per month directly out of the business cash flow for 10 years, use the surplus cash to cover closing costs, and close in days rather than months.

The seller's only remaining concern was whether his money was safer in the business or in the stock market... So his solution was to retain 10% ownership, keep visibility into the bank accounts, and sign the deal.

That single conversation gave the structure its name - and its sales script.

Allen's central point is worth restating: seller financing and an annuity deal are the same transaction... The difference is entirely in positioning.

Most buyers lead with the buyer's perspective - "I'd like to pay you over time." Allen flips it. He leads with the seller's outcome - "I can pay you more money, with less tax, in a faster close, with less stress, as predictable monthly income."

For acquisition entrepreneurs working a seller pipeline this quarter, the action item is simple:

Thanks for reading Acquiring & Exiting

Interested in getting your business in front of our audience of 3,500+ M&A readers? Find out more about our new sponsorship opportunities HERE.